And the Supreme Court -- for now -- won’t hear drugmaker challenges to Medicare ‘negotiations’
And BMS warns CMS that changes to Medicare negotiation rules could impede innovation for compounds that solve “time toxicity”
And congrats to the ten of you who are still perfect in the Apex “Nobody Knows” prediction contest after the Makary news
And Optum Rx says it will overhaul how it charges for PBM services
And two useful correctives to the White House’s myopic views on how international reference pricing works in the real world
And a podcast recommendation on the coming challenges in oncology
And industry gets a win in a 340B “STD loophole” case
And there is bipartisan consensus on the most divisive issue in health care [sic]
Plus, launching the quarterly Apex tracker of CEO earnings commentary
And Elizabeth Warren’s inquiry into TrumpRx asks the exact questions I’m interested in
And the votes are in on the “healthcare” vs “health care” debate ...
And I need your vote on an issue of huge significance
And we know that CMS will pay for obesity meds in Medicare through 2027. But what about 2028 ... and beyond?
And BMS’ pricing transparency data is out, showing that net prices continue to fall
And United had a blowout earnings release. Its PBM, Optum Rx? Not so much.
And more evidence that prior authorization decisions are often delayed
I'm looking for your vote on whether the CMS pilot will move forward
And a sampling of the comments on a Labor Department proposal to rein in PBMs
And the majority of new prescriptions written get rejected by commercial plans, IQVIA analysis finds